Case: Dismissed Maxterpiece v. Department of Justice: FCA 001

Status
Not open for further replies.

Maxterpiece

Citizen of the Republic
Joined
Jul 30, 2024
Messages
28
IN THE FEDERALCOURT OF ANDORN

Maxterpiece,
Plaintiff,
v.
Department of Justice,
Defendant.

Case No. # FCA-001
Action filed: June, 7, 2025
Judge Unseatedduke1, CJ
Complaint


JURISDICTION, VENUE, & ADMINISTRATIVE PREREQUISITES
1. The Federal Court of Andorn has jurisdiction over criminal cases

THE PARTIES

1. Maxterpiece (“Plaintiff”)
2. Department of Justice (“Defendant”)
3. MilkCrack
4. Giggly999legs

FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1. On or about June 7, 2025 at the time of 1:15 CST, The plaintiff was handcuffed and jailed by Justice Secretary MilkCrack, without being informed of his charge.
2. on or about June 7, 2025 at the time of 1:25 CST, Giggly999legs let the Plaintiff out of his cell
3. on or about June 7, 2025 at the time of 1:28 CST, the Plaintiff was jailed for 'Escaping' and a further punishment of 10 minutes was added.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
1. The Plaintiff claims the Andorn Criminal Code Section II, Paragraph 3, Part 5(1): "All accused shall enjoy the following rights and privileges; The right to be informed of the charge that they are accused of."
2. The Plaintiff claims the Andorn Criminal Code Section II, Paragraph 3, Part 6: "If any of the Rights and privileges outlined in “Section 2 (3), (5)” are proven to be in any way infringed, all present charges are to be dismissed."
3. With the above in mind the Plaintiff asserts that he was jailed illegally
4. The Plaintiff asserts that with the above in mind, The Plaintiff cannot be charged with 'Escaping' on account of the fact that the Plaintiff was never in lawful custody, and therefore couldn't escape lawful custody.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF
THEREFORE, Plaintiff demands the following;
1. A payment of $40 for the 15 minutes spent in jail (As Speaker the Plaintiff is paid $40 per 15 minutes. therefore 15 minutes of the Plaintiffs time is worth $40
2. A payment of $53 for the 20 minutes spent writing this lawsuit (see above)
3. A payment of $100 for the loss of potential revenue that occurred from being in jail. (The Plaintiff was about to close a $100 deal, but was denied at the last second on account of him being in jail)


Respectfully submitted,
Maxterpiece
Self-Representing
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NewSupremeCourtSeal.png

Writ of Summons​


@MilkCrack is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Maxterpiece v. Department of Justice.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures


I strongly encourage the plaintiff to seek a resolution with the government through an agreement. This is a minor matter that could be resolved more efficiently outside of a full trial. Please be advised that court fees will be imposed on both parties for the use of court resources.
 
On what grounds?
 
Motion to dismiss

Your honour,


The Department of Justice is in the process of updating and refining its internal policies. Nevertheless, we maintain that our actions were in accordance with the law.


In the interest of judicial economy, and without admitting any wrongdoing, we will satisfy the plaintiff’s prayer for relief in full. Accordingly, we submit that there is no longer a justiciable controversy before the Court and respectfully request that this matter be dismissed

Edit: We will transfer the $193 as soon as possible.
 
Is the plaintiff satisfied?
 
A Settlement has been reached your honor, The plaintiff would like to dismiss charges
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top